Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
2.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 208(1): 25-38, 2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2297287

ABSTRACT

Rationale: Defining lung recruitability is needed for safe positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection in mechanically ventilated patients. However, there is no simple bedside method including both assessment of recruitability and risks of overdistension as well as personalized PEEP titration. Objectives: To describe the range of recruitability using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), effects of PEEP on recruitability, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, and a method to select optimal EIT-based PEEP. Methods: This is the analysis of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from an ongoing multicenter prospective physiological study including patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome of different causes. EIT, ventilator data, hemodynamics, and arterial blood gases were obtained during PEEP titration maneuvers. EIT-based optimal PEEP was defined as the crossing point of the overdistension and collapse curves during a decremental PEEP trial. Recruitability was defined as the amount of modifiable collapse when increasing PEEP from 6 to 24 cm H2O (ΔCollapse24-6). Patients were classified as low, medium, or high recruiters on the basis of tertiles of ΔCollapse24-6. Measurements and Main Results: In 108 patients with COVID-19, recruitability varied from 0.3% to 66.9% and was unrelated to acute respiratory distress syndrome severity. Median EIT-based PEEP differed between groups: 10 versus 13.5 versus 15.5 cm H2O for low versus medium versus high recruitability (P < 0.05). This approach assigned a different PEEP level from the highest compliance approach in 81% of patients. The protocol was well tolerated; in four patients, the PEEP level did not reach 24 cm H2O because of hemodynamic instability. Conclusions: Recruitability varies widely among patients with COVID-19. EIT allows personalizing PEEP setting as a compromise between recruitability and overdistension. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04460859).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Electric Impedance , Prospective Studies , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography/methods
5.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2022: 2495-2501, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2018733

ABSTRACT

Point-of-Care monitoring devices have proven to be pivotal in the timely screening and intervention of critical care patients. The urgent demands for their deployment in the COVID-19 pandemic era has translated into the escalation of rapid, reliable, and low-cost monitoring systems research and development. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a highly promising modality in providing deep tissue imaging that aids in patient bedside diagnosis and treatment. Motivated to bring forth an accurate and intelligent EIT screening system, we bypassed the complexity and challenges typically associated with its image reconstruction and feature identification processes by solely focusing on the raw data output to extract the embedded knowledge. We developed a novel machine learning architecture based on an attention-driven spatial transformer neural network to specifically accommodate for the patterns and dependencies within EIT raw data. Through elaborate precision-mapped phantom experiments, we validated the reproduction and recognition of features with systemically controlled changes. We demonstrated over 95% accuracy via state-of-the-art machine learning models, and an enhanced performance using our adapted transformer pipeline with shorter training time and greater computational efficiency. Our approach of using imageless EIT driven by a novel attention-focused feature learning algorithm is highly promising in revolutionizing conventional EIT operations and augmenting its practical usage in medicine and beyond.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Attention , Electric Impedance , Humans , Neural Networks, Computer , Tomography/methods
6.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 14517, 2022 08 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2016838

ABSTRACT

Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection present with different lung compliance and progression of disease differs. Measures of lung mechanics in SARS-CoV-2 patients may unravel different pathophysiologic mechanisms during mechanical ventilation. The objective of this prospective observational study is to describe whether Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels unravel changes in EIT-derived parameters over time and whether the changes differ between survivors and non-survivors. Serial EIT-measurements of alveolar overdistension, collapse, and compliance change in ventilated SARS-CoV-2 patients were analysed. In 80 out of 94 patients, we took 283 EIT measurements (93 from day 1-3 after intubation, 66 from day 4-6, and 124 from day 7 and beyond). Fifty-one patients (64%) survived the ICU. At admission mean PaO2/FiO2-ratio was 184.3 (SD 61.4) vs. 151.3 (SD 54.4) mmHg, (p = 0.017) and PEEP was 11.8 (SD 2.8) cmH2O vs. 11.3 (SD 3.4) cmH2O, (p = 0.475), for ICU survivors and non-survivors. At day 1-3, compliance was ~ 55 mL/cmH2O vs. ~ 45 mL/cmH2O in survivors vs. non-survivors. The intersection of overdistension and collapse curves appeared similar at a PEEP of ~ 12-13 cmH2O. At day 4-6 compliance changed to ~ 50 mL/cmH2O vs. ~ 38 mL/cmH2O. At day 7 and beyond, compliance was ~ 38 mL/cmH2O with the intersection at a PEEP of ~ 9 cmH2O vs. ~ 25 mL/cmH2O with overdistension intersecting at collapse curves at a PEEP of ~ 7 cmH2O. Surviving SARS-CoV-2 patients show more favourable EIT-derived parameters and a higher compliance compared to non-survivors over time. This knowledge is valuable for discovering the different groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Electric Impedance , Humans , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
8.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 28(3): 292-301, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1816323

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a novel, noninvasive, radiation-free, bedside imaging and monitoring tool to assess and visualize regional distribution of lung ventilation and perfusion. Although primarily a research tool, rapidly emerging data are beginning to define its clinical role, and it is poised to become a ubiquitous addition to the arsenal of the intensive care unit (ICU). In this review, we summarize the data supporting clinical use of EIT in adult ICUs, with an emphasis on appropriate application while highlighting future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent major studies have primarily focused on the role of EIT in setting correct positive end-expiratory pressure to balance regional overdistention and collapse. Over the last few years, our Lung Rescue Team has demonstrated that incorporating EIT into a multimodal approach to individualizing ventilator management can improve outcomes, particularly in the obese. We also review recent data surrounding EIT use during COVID, as well as other broad potential applications. SUMMARY: As EIT becomes more common and its clinical role more defined, intensivists will benefit from a clear understanding of its applications and limitations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tomography , Adult , Electric Impedance , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Tomography/methods
10.
BMC Pulm Med ; 21(1): 357, 2021 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1506499

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a noninvasive, radiation-free, bedside tool to monitor ventilation distribution in real time. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in pediatric COVID-19 patients, the ventilation distribution using EIT and compare it to thoracic computed tomography (TCT) or chest radiograph results obtained in these patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational clinical study including pediatric patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a private hospital. The patients monitored with EIT tested positive for COVID-19 and were submitted to the previously mentioned radiation exams. EIT monitoring lasted 15 min and no sedation was used. RESULTS: Six patients were included in this study. The main differences observed in the EIT were in the right-left distribution and were compatible with the morphological changes found in the TCT or radiograph images due to COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: We conclude that EIT is ready to investigate the ventilatory profile present at different lung diseases, including COVID-19, and might postpone or mitigate the need of repeated ionizing radiation exams in the pediatric population, although larger pediatric cohorts comparing to standard radiological imaging are needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Electric Impedance , Tomography/methods , COVID-19/therapy , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies
11.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 36(4): 975-985, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1356022

ABSTRACT

Respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 may progress rapidly. During the course of COVID-19, patients develop an increased respiratory drive, which may induce high mechanical strain a known risk factor for Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury (P-SILI). We developed a novel Electrical Impedance Tomography-based approach to visualize the Dynamic Relative Regional Strain (DRRS) in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients and compared these findings with measurements in lung healthy volunteers. DRRS was defined as the ratio of tidal impedance changes and end-expiratory lung impedance within each pixel of the lung region. DRRS values of the ten patients were considerably higher than those of the ten healthy volunteers. On repeated examination, patterns, magnitude and frequency distribution of DRRS were reproducible and in line with the clinical course of the patients. Lung ultrasound scores correlated with the number of pixels showing DRRS values above the derived threshold. Using Electrical Impedance Tomography we were able to generate, for the first time, images of DRRS which might indicate P-SILI in patients suffering from COVID-19.Trial Registration This observational study was registered 06.04.2020 in German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00021276).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tomography , Electric Impedance , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography/methods
12.
Adv Med Sci ; 66(2): 388-395, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1347463

ABSTRACT

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, radiation-free method of diagnostics imaging, allowing for a bedside, real-time dynamic assessment of lung function. It stands as an alternative for other imagining methods, such as computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound. Even though the technique is rather novel, it has a wide variety of possible applications. In the era of modern mechanical ventilation, a dynamic assessment of patient's respiratory condition appears to fulfil the idea of personalized treatment. Additionally, an increasing frequency of respiratory failure among intensive care populations raises demand for improved monitoring tools. This review aims to raise awareness and presents possible implications for the use of EIT in the intensive care setting.


Subject(s)
Electric Impedance , Monitoring, Physiologic , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Tomography/methods , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Respir Med ; 187: 106555, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1330039

ABSTRACT

Setting the proper level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a cornerstone of lung protective ventilation. PEEP keeps the alveoli open at the end of expiration, thus reducing atelectrauma and shunt. However, excessive PEEP may contribute to alveolar overdistension. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive bedside tool that monitors in real-time ventilation distribution. Aim of this narrative review is summarizing the techniques for EIT-guided PEEP titration, while providing useful insights to enhance comprehension on advantages and limits of EIT for current and future users. EIT detects thoracic impedance to alternating electrical currents between pairs of electrodes and, through the analysis of its temporal and spatial variation, reconstructs a two-dimensional slice image of the lung depicting regional variation of ventilation and perfusion. Several EIT-based methods have been proposed for PEEP titration. The first described technique estimates the variations of regional lung compliance during a decremental PEEP trial, after lung recruitment. The optimal PEEP value is represented by the best compromise between lung collapse and overdistension. Later on, a second technique assessing alveolar recruitment by variation of the end-expiratory lung impedance was validated. Finally, the global inhomogeneity index and the regional ventilation delay, two EIT-derived parameters, showed promising results selecting the optimal PEEP value as the one that presents the lowest global inhomogeneity index or the lowest regional ventilation delay. In conclusion EIT represents a promising technique to individualize PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients. Whether EIT is the best technique for this purpose and the overall influence of personalizing PEEP on clinical outcome remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
Lung/physiopathology , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Point-of-Care Testing , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Tomography/methods , Electric Impedance , Humans , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Pulmonary Atelectasis/etiology , Pulmonary Atelectasis/prevention & control , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology
17.
BMC Pulm Med ; 21(1): 38, 2021 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1044906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical management of COVID-19 requires close monitoring of lung function. While computed tomography (CT) offers ideal way to identify the phenotypes, it cannot monitor the patient response to therapeutic interventions. We present a case of ventilation management for a COVID-19 patient where electrical impedance tomography (EIT) was used to personalize care. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, required invasive mechanical ventilation, and was subsequently weaned. EIT was used multiple times: to titrate the positive end-expiratory pressure, understand the influence of body position, and guide the support levels during weaning and after extubation. We show how EIT provides bedside monitoring of the patient´s response to various therapeutic interventions and helps guide treatments. CONCLUSION: EIT provides unique information that may help the ventilation management in the pandemic of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Electric Impedance , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Patient Positioning/methods , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Tomography/methods , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Ventilator Weaning/methods
20.
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 24(4): 287-292, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-760476

ABSTRACT

At the end of 2019, a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) was identified as the cause of a cluster of pneumonia cases, with high needs of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients. It is still unclear whether different types of COVID-19 pneumonia require different ventilator strategies. With electrical impedance tomography (EIT) we evaluated, in real time and bedside, the distribution of ventilation in the different pulmonary regions before, during, and after pronation in COVID-19 respiratory failure. We present a brief literature review of EIT in non-COVID-19 patients and a report of 2 COVID-19 patients: one that did not respond well and another one that improved during and after pronation. EIT might be a useful tool to decide whether prone positioning should or should not be used in COVID-19 pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Electric Impedance , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Tomography/methods , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Prone Position , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL